Home › Books & Reviews › Capsule Reviews › African Conflict Resolution: The U.S. Role in Peacemaking

African Conflict Resolution: The U.S. Role in Peacemaking

Edited by David R. Smock and Chester A. Crocker
Reviewed by Gail M. Gerhart
November/December 1996
African Conflict Resolution: The U.S. Role in Peacemaking
Edited by David R. Smock and Chester A. Crocker
U.S. Institute of Peace Press
1995
163 pp.
$14.95
Login or Register to leave a comment.

An overview of America's actions and options in promoting peace in Africa. The contributors propose building the capacity of Africans -- in governments, military establishments, universities, nongovernmental organizations, regional bodies, and especially the Organization of African Unity -- to prevent and resolve conflicts, with practical suggestions for diplomatic action, training, logistical backup, and institutional support. Unfortunately, the book is marred by shamelessly distorted presentations of Reagan administration policies of "constructive engagement" and "linkage" in southern Africa. Crocker, who was assistant secretary of state for African affairs from 1981 to 1989, claims these policies were successful "leadership in African peacemaking," but most Africa experts blame them for prolonging the wars in Angola and Namibia and encouraging South Africa's aggression and intransigence. Robert Oakley, U.S. special envoy to Somalia in 1992-93, turns the "success" story into an even more imaginative fable in which South Africa "actively discussed and negotiated rather than . . . relying on the use of military force."

Related

Essay, Spring 1981
Japanese Security Policies and the United States
Gerald L. Curtis

Americans who follow trends in Japanese security policies tend to divide into those who see little significant change, particularly in terms of the central importance of the U.S. alliance, and those who believe that Japan is poised to embark on a more assertive and independent course involving independent military capabilities and an important role in regional security. Which view is more nearly correct, and how the balance is struck between autonomy and alliance, are crucially important questions, both in themselves and in terms of U.S.-Japan relations.

Read
Essay, Sep/Oct 2000
Redesigning Foreign Aid
Carol Lancaster

The traditional goals of U.S. foreign aid -- promoting U.S. security and fostering development in poor countries -- are no longer as pressing after the Cold War. Washington must revamp its approach to aid and address new, urgent priorities: shoring up peacekeeping efforts in such places as the Middle East and the Balkans; easing the transition to globalization; tackling transnational environmental crises and diseases; and improving the quality of life for the world's neediest. This new diplomacy will not only transform U.S. aid but bolster its relevance to American interests and values in a rapidly changing world.

Read
Essay, Fall 1987
The Choice in Central America
Susan Kaufman Purcell

The USA maintains that its aim is for a peaceful settlement in Nicaragua in a regional context that advances the prospects for democracy, protects the interests of the Contras and preserves US strategic interests. These goals involve a potentially long and difficult process. The accord concluded by the Central American Presidents in Aug 1987 by no means ensures peace. The practical question facing the USA is how to preserve its commitment to the Contras while still influencing the negotiating process.

Read
Cover image

In the Magazine

November/December 2009, 6, 88
Essay
The Dollar and the Deficits
C. Fred Bergsten

The global economic crisis has revealed the folly of large U.S. budget and trade deficits, as well as of the strong dollar that makes them possible. If it is serious about recovery, the United States must balance the budget, stimulate private saving, and embrace a declining dollar.
Read