The Big Ten: The Big Emerging Markets and How They Will Change Our Lives
Drawing on his experience as undersecretary of commerce for international trade from 1993 to 1995, Garten attempts to justify the Clinton administration's emphasis on commercial diplomacy, while not dwelling on its serious mistakes. It is an exercise in what could be called constructive alarmism, a wake-up call about the changing international structure and opportunities. Its basic message is surely right: America's government and businesses should pay more attention to emerging markets, for that is where the economic action is likely to be in coming decades. Garten identifies ten countries as big emerging markets: Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Korea, Mexico, Poland, South Africa, and Turkey.
Following Clinton, he lays heavy emphasis on the importance of jobs, fashionable political currency both in Europe and in the United States. But for the near future, the quantity and quality of employment will be determined by the overall performance of the domestic economy in its many dimensions, and only marginally by trade with emerging markets. Furthermore, exclusive or even predominant concentration on the big ten is likely to be misguided. A similar book written 30 years ago would have missed South Korea altogether; the Koreas of the future may not be among these ten countries. But that point does not blunt the thrust of Garten's message, only its focus.
Related
With the U.S. economy soaring, few care that immigration to the United States is at its highest absolute levels. But what happens when the economy falls back to earth? High-tech immigrant workers are already competing with Americans for jobs, while unskilled immigrant laborers are becoming a permanent underclass. High immigration is creating imbalances in education, income distribution, employment, and welfare demands -- as well as tensions between immigrants and citizens and among the federal, state, and local governments. An economic slump will mean crisis. Congress and the White House need to cut back now.
Will Russia be run by democrats or oligarchs? The signs are worrying. The West would rather not dwell on the extent to which Russia's market is dominated by robber barons and permeated by crime and corruption. Russia's democracy is weak, with unfair election campaigns, a compromised media, and few checks on the presidency. The West cannot afford to let Russia descend into chaos, which might mean losing control of Russia's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, but its two-faced NATO expansion policy hurts the democrats' chances.
The growing economic disputes between the USA and Japan could develop into a serious political conflict. The 'Japan problem' is rooted in two fictions (1) that the Japanese state has central organs of government which bear ultimate responsibility for economic and political decision-making, whereas the Japanese system is a collection of different hierarchies without a centre (2) that Japan has a free-market capitalist economy, whereas it is actually a 'capitalist development state', characterized by a partnership between central bureaucrats and entrepreneurs. Fixed trade commitments could be part of the solution.
