The Politics of Jerusalem Since 1967
This book, while written from a perspective that assumes that both Israeli and Palestinian interests in Jerusalem will eventually have to be addressed in any lasting settlement, is largely devoid of propaganda. Instead, one finds carefully documented information on the demography of the city, maps that show the changes over time, and a catalog of issues that have to be addressed on a daily basis. A reader will learn to suspect the grandiose claims of partisans. For example, the frequent Israeli assertion that Jerusalem has always had a Jewish majority depends on how one defines the city. Even now, there is no agreed definition of what constitutes Jerusalem. Within the confines of the present-day municipality, Israelis make up about two-thirds of the population, but the contiguous metropolitan area just beyond the boundaries of the city is predominantly Arab. Reading this book will help to explain why the dispute over building additional homes for Jews on one of the remaining empty spaces in Jerusalem evokes such strong emotions.
Related
How does Binyamin Netanyahu do it? The continued popularity of Israel's Likud prime minister, despite his derailment of a popular peace process, is the great paradox of Israeli politics. The key is the rise of the soft right, an odd mix of ultra-Orthodox Jews and secular immigrants from the former Soviet Union whose newfound influence lets Netanyahu defy political gravity. He holds their support by pandering to their distaste for Arabs and Israel's secular left. But the soft right is not only right but also soft and thus less wedded to a hard line. If Netanyahu drags Israel into a bloody confrontation, they could desert him for a more dovish candidate.
Judith Miller knocked in the Middle East, and many doors opened. But her focus on Islamic militancy blinded her to enlightened currents of Islam. Separation of religion and state is not a real option in a region where the faith is central to life, but Muslims can choose what kind of Islam will hold sway.
The Oslo accord has failed. Battered by a wave of fundamentalist terrorism, Israelis are ready to elect a hard-line Likud government, while many frustrated Palestinians are spurning the plo in favor of the Islamic extremists of Hamas. Locked in a political embrace, ploChairman Yasir Arafat and Israeli PrimeMinister Yitzhak Rabin are dragging each other down. The process may stagger on, but it will never yield peace.
