The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950-1957
Hail the pioneer! Jean Monnet devised a method, both cautious and bold, pragmatic and ideological, aimed at integrating nations that had often been at war with one another, many of which were proud of their past and all of which had emerged after 1945 in a world where Western Europe was no longer the core of international affairs but a dependent of one superpower and a potential victim of the other. Political scientists needed to grapple with an approach that aimed at transcending the nation-state yet was quite different from classical federalism because it was functionally piecemeal and institutionally more technocratic than democratic.
Haas was the first theorist of the Monnet method. In this (early) study of the Coal and Steel Community, he introduced all the concepts that the huge subsequent literature on European integration has used and argued about ever since. Even those who disagree with his theory (especially with his notion of "spillover," which suggested that integration in one functional area would almost necessarily lead to integration in others) on empirical or normative grounds owe him a huge debt -- especially as Haas himself did not remain stuck in his ideas, but candidly acknowledged that the development of what is now the European Union did not always fit his original theory. He built the solid foundations of what is now a huge theoretical edifice.
Related
The EU's expansion into the postcommunist east offers new hope for the Gypsies, Europe's most despised minority. Enforcement of EU human rights law and a growth in political consciousness may finally end the discrimination that the Roma have suffered for centuries. But already the backlash has begun.
In recent months, many observers have concluded that the United States and Europe are on divergent paths and that the transatlantic alliance is crumbling. In spite of some real differences, however, American and European attitudes remain remarkably similar on most key issues. Basing policy on the false assumption of transatlantic divorce would only make it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Brussels has delayed a decision on whether to admit Turkey to the EU. This caution is wise: it may aggravate the Turks, but no one really knows what consequences accession would bring, and Turkey has yet to achieve Europe's economic standards. History suggests that open borders would bring a flood of Turks northward looking for better jobs--a negative development for all the countries involved.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.