Although we bandy the word about, it is surprising how little we understand globalization. Often confused as one and the same, interdependence is actually an important precursor of globalization. But as more countries leave an interdependent world and are buffeted by the forces of globalization, policymakers are tempted to react with anachronistic strategies -- the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act, the Helms-Burton Act, Quebec's secession -- that threaten the new order. Global public policy is the way to evolve, and will show the way between competing worlds.
Wolfgang H. Reinicke is a Senior Scholar in the Foreign Policy Studies Program at the Brookings Institution. This article is based on his forthcoming book, Global Public Policy: Governing Without Government?
GOING GLOBAL
Given the widespread use of the term globalization, it is surprising how little we know about it. In most cases, it is asserted but never defined. Those who do describe it characterize it as a continuous increase of cross-border financial and economic activities leading to greater economic interdependence. Essentially, interdependence and globalization are used interchangeably. This creates a paradox: the same term that is understood as a mere quantitative rise in a trend going back to the 1960s is also used to refer to a fundamental qualitative change in the international system, predicting perhaps the end of the nation-state. If the former is true, there is little need for governments to reassess their role, or that of the institutions and principles that have governed the world economy since the end of World War II, in view of globalization. If the latter holds, it becomes necessary to draw a distinction between economic interdependence and globalization, a distinction that provides a basis for reassessing the role of government and governance in an emerging global economy.
Unlike interdependence, which narrowed the distance between sovereign states and caused closer macroeconomic cooperation, globalization is a microeconomic phenomenon. Globalization represents the integration of a cross-national dimension into the very nature of the organizational structure and strategic behavior of individual companies. The cross-border movement of intangible capital, such as finance, technology, and information, allows companies to enhance their competitiveness.
This is a premium article
You must be a Foreign Affairs subscriber to continue reading. If you are already a print subscriber, click here to activate your online access.
Log In
Buy PDF
Buy a premium PDF reprint of this article.Related
Samuel Huntington's notion of Western civilization is neither accurate description nor useful prescription. So say G. John Ikenberry and others.
A verse to Huntington's thesis.
The Middle Ages ended when the rise of capitalism on a national scale led to powerful states with sovereignty over particular territories and populations. Now that capitalism is operating globally, those states are eroding and a new medievalism is emerging, marked by multiple and overlapping sovereignties and identities -- particularly in the developing world, where states were never strong in the first place.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.