Rise of the Fighter Generals: The Problem of Air Force Leadership, 1945-1982
Military organizations change most durably and profoundly when they draw their leadership from new groups. This interesting sociological study by an active-duty colonel focuses on one such transformation. In the late 1940s bomber generals, such as the famous Curtis LeMay, dominated the U.S. Air force. By the 1980s fighter generals ran it. The credential of combat service in Vietnam helps account for this shift: far more fighter pilots went to war and came back with the prestige that comes with battle. But, Worden argues, technology (the rise of intercontinental ballistic missiles as competition for bombers) and a narrow doctrinal outlook, in particular, profound reluctance to think through the requirements of limited war, also crippled the bomber pilots' ability to lead. Today, bomber generals are not an endangered species, but there is no doubt who won the competition.
Related
The tools and techniques for waging war never stand still, but these are the early days of a revolution in military affairs as momentous as those wrought by the railroad and the airplane. This newest transformation is a consequence of developments in civilian society including the information revolution and postindustrial capitalism. Its satellite imagery and smart bombs will change the forms of combat and armies. Personnel and politics, as always, will be as crucial as technology.
The United States may be an uncontested military superpower, but it remains defenseless against a new mode of attack: information warfare. As the military, the private sector, and Washington grow increasingly dependent on computers and information networks, they also grow more vulnerable to cyber-attack. Cyberspace is becoming the new front line of warfare, and private citizens are the new prime target. U.S. policymakers and technology entrepreneurs must wake up to this threat and build a wall of defense -- now.
The Cold War induced caution in nations that feared uncontrollable escalation. Now that confrontations are less likely to careen out of control, a new season of bellicosity is here. The U.S. military, trapped in a Cold War mindset, has failed to realize this. It is spending far too much on casualty-prone units in all the services, in an age when political opposition to casualties effectively makes these units unavailable for combat. The military should recalibrate its priorities and shift funds to weapons such as high-tech lasers, stealth aircraft, and cruise missiles that can make warfare less lethal for Americans.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.