The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe
A political scientist at Princeton, Berman compares the Swedish and German Social Democratic parties during the interwar period to explain their divergent fates. She argues that scholars should go beyond examining political and structural factors to account for the parties' fundamentally distinct approaches; it was opposing notions of socialism that made the critical difference. The Swedish party was reformist and flexible, with "a relatively mild view of the class struggle." In contrast, their German counterparts took a "strident" approach that was suspicious of reform, reluctant to embrace Keynesian solutions during the Depression, and inflexibly Marxist. All of these features, she argues, contributed to the collapse of the Weimar Republic. Her work is convincing and well written, and her discussion of the role of ideas is spirited and welcome. Chapter 2 should be required reading for all political scientists who are unwilling to look beyond numbers to see the force of ideas.
Related
Tony Judt is right to have doubts about the future of European union, but his jeremiad lacks an eye for detail.
France's foreign minister, Hubert Vedrine, is often charged with being anti-American. As his new book shows, however, his brand of realist diplomacy is more subtle and pragmatic than his American critics see it.
Not much attention was paid in March 1985, when the European Council, whose members include the chiefs of state and government of the 12 member states, decided that it should constitute a single market by 1992. After all, the European Community had been established in 1957 with the goal of a common market, and many people believed that the goal had been reached; tariffs within the Community had been abolished, a common external tariff put in place and a controversial common agricultural policy instituted.
