The Chan's Great Continent: China in Western Minds
Spence is unquestionably the best story-teller of all historians of China, and he never fails to come up with intriguing topics viewed from original perspectives. This time he recounts the image of China in the Western mind. From Marco Polo in the thirteenth century to Jesuit missionaries and Enlightenment philosophers to contemporary China-watchers, Spence shows how Western observers have used both positive and negative fantasies of Chinese civilization to reflect the state of Western civilization. For some, China was a superior civilization with elegant manners and ancient wisdom; for others it offered dark visions of cruel rulers and hordes of devious tricksters. Henry Kissinger was as awestruck on meeting Mao as Marco Polo was before Kublai Khan. Spence's interest is purely narrative; he relates his 48 "sightings" of China rather than advancing any theoretical or moral lessons. His fascination lies with each particular imagined China, not with potential conclusions for the Western mind -- although China as a distant Other has clearly served multiple purposes for the Western psyche. Even today, exaggerated swings in U.S. policy toward China reflect American vacillation between images of a "good" and a "bad" China.
Related
Are The Tiananmen Papers authentic? What do they tell us? The truth could overturn an official history that has stymied political reform in China for a decade.
Christopher Patten's new book goes beyond Hong Kong to offer a sensible middle ground in the debate over the link between culture and Asia's rise -- and fall.
For some months, 1966 promised to be a year of significant albeit gradual change in American policy toward Communist China. In a strange and paradoxical fashion, the emotional issues of the Viet Nam War opened the way for the most sober, responsible and even-handed public discussion of China since the Communists came to power. At Congressional hearings and in the mass media, scholars and leaders of opinion have dispassionately calculated the possibilities for change, and Administration leaders have in their customarily guarded language intimated that change was not impossible. Most significant of all, the American public demonstrated a gratifying degree of maturity by forgetting the old passions and asking for only facts and analyses about the new China. Our national mood was increasingly one of believing that with prudence and wisdom it would be possible to work toward gradually incorporating China into responsible world relationships.
