China Joins the World: Progress and Prospects; The Paradox of China's Post-Mao Reforms
These two symposium volumes seek to explain China from different perspectives -- but as with the blind men and the elephant, they provide somewhat different pictures. China Joins the World focuses on China's international relations, asking what Western policies might induce China to become a constructive participant in international institutions and regimes. In general, the authors are optimistic about socializing China in this direction and see most Chinese officials as anxious to become effective international players. In contrast, the Goldman-MacFarquhar volume covers the more problematic questions of elite politics and the broad discontent unleashed by economic reforms. By confronting the problems fragmenting Chinese society, the authors present a less optimistic picture than Economy and Oksenberg, but their account also makes more understandable the xenophobic explosion after the NATO bombing of China's Belgrade embassy last spring.
In a strange way, the two books' differences mirror a peculiarity in U.S.-China relations. Both governments seem anxious to separate domestic developments from interstate relations. The authors in the Economy-Oksenberg volume hold out the hope that this is possible, but Goldman and MacFarquhar's authors provide considerable evidence that it is not.
Related
Are The Tiananmen Papers authentic? What do they tell us? The truth could overturn an official history that has stymied political reform in China for a decade.
Christopher Patten's new book goes beyond Hong Kong to offer a sensible middle ground in the debate over the link between culture and Asia's rise -- and fall.
For some months, 1966 promised to be a year of significant albeit gradual change in American policy toward Communist China. In a strange and paradoxical fashion, the emotional issues of the Viet Nam War opened the way for the most sober, responsible and even-handed public discussion of China since the Communists came to power. At Congressional hearings and in the mass media, scholars and leaders of opinion have dispassionately calculated the possibilities for change, and Administration leaders have in their customarily guarded language intimated that change was not impossible. Most significant of all, the American public demonstrated a gratifying degree of maturity by forgetting the old passions and asking for only facts and analyses about the new China. Our national mood was increasingly one of believing that with prudence and wisdom it would be possible to work toward gradually incorporating China into responsible world relationships.
