The Politics of Post-Suharto Indonesia; Post-Soeharto Indonesia: Renewal or Chaos?; Indonesia: The Challenge of Change
These three symposium volumes were initially intended to explain Indonesia's "miracle" economy, but by the time the authors met, their challenge had become to forecast post-Suharto Indonesia's future. The enduring value of their endeavors is not so much the test of prediction but the new information that the regime's breakdown has exposed. The Paris-Schwarz report vividly captures the dynamics of the crisis, especially in William Liddle's chapter on Suharto's failure in leadership and John Bresnan's insightful analysis of the IMF and U.S. policy prescriptions during the turmoil. The book by Baker et al. examines how twelve different institutions -- from the bureaucracy to the army to the Muslim political parties -- face the challenge of change, offering solid academic studies that contain a mass of information and insights. Finally, the Foster collection is, more than the others, explicitly directed to foreseeing the future -- with reasonable success in predicting the elections, but not the shocking horror of East Timor. All of the studies show that although it is possible to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the various actors and institutions, it is extremely difficult to foresee the final equilibrium of all these forces -- since Indonesia's possibilities range from reinvigorated stability to chaos and national disintegration.
Related
Are The Tiananmen Papers authentic? What do they tell us? The truth could overturn an official history that has stymied political reform in China for a decade.
Christopher Patten's new book goes beyond Hong Kong to offer a sensible middle ground in the debate over the link between culture and Asia's rise -- and fall.
For some months, 1966 promised to be a year of significant albeit gradual change in American policy toward Communist China. In a strange and paradoxical fashion, the emotional issues of the Viet Nam War opened the way for the most sober, responsible and even-handed public discussion of China since the Communists came to power. At Congressional hearings and in the mass media, scholars and leaders of opinion have dispassionately calculated the possibilities for change, and Administration leaders have in their customarily guarded language intimated that change was not impossible. Most significant of all, the American public demonstrated a gratifying degree of maturity by forgetting the old passions and asking for only facts and analyses about the new China. Our national mood was increasingly one of believing that with prudence and wisdom it would be possible to work toward gradually incorporating China into responsible world relationships.
