Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism
This book shows why Buchanan's worldview is such an anachronism. No more than ten percent of Americans really want their country to turn away from the world and its global institutions. In fact, public opinion is much more open to international engagement than most of America's current leaders realize. Support for internationalism actually seems to have gone up since the Cold War ended, perhaps because of a vague but strong sense of growing global interdependence. Kull and Destler show that even members of Congress (those supposedly sensitive weathervanes) are quite mistaken about public opinion on these issues, often misled by their constituent mail. In their most beguiling chapter, the authors cleverly devise a way to let citizens allocate money according to their own vision of the federal budget. In their sample, average citizens tend to increase domestic spending, double spending on the State Department, triple spending on the United Nations, and pay for it all by cutting defense by 40 percent.
Related
Reviews recent US public opinion poll evidence on relations with USSR and security issues, finding a cautious attitude, stressing verification and other means of testing Soviet 'good faith'. Americans believe that (1) Gorbachev seeks "to change... the very character of the Soviet Union" (2) the nuclear threat from a (hypothetical) terrorist group or Third World power is greater than that from the USSR (3) today's greatest challenges (including pollution, terrorism, over-population and trade) "are no longer East-West in nature but global".
The manner in which President Bush terminated US military action against Iraq, and the unsatisfactoriness of the residual situation in the Gulf region with Saddam Hussein still in place, served to erode that sense of purpose and self-confidence with which Americans were persuaded to embark on that action. "He left them in confusion over exactly what they had been fighting for in the Persian Gulf, hence over what America's role should be in the post-Cold War world".
Presidential campaigns do more than choose individuals for high office: our history shows many instances where elections have moved the country closer to a decisive resolution of long-standing issues. The 1984 presidential campaign gives the candidates a historic opportunity to build public support for reducing the risk of nuclear war. The American electorate is now psychologically prepared to take a giant step toward real arms reductions.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.