Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships
The late Olson was known for dissecting complex social phenomena with simple answers and bringing his economic training to bear on numerous political issues. Here he asks why countries differ so greatly in their productivity. Casting aside explanations that highlight a country's natural resources or free markets, he looks at transactions over time (like loans) and the necessary social machinery for making and enforcing contracts -- a quintessential role of government. Harking back to his earlier works on the evolution of government, Olson argues that even autocratic rulers have an interest in treating their subjects better, simply because prosperous and content citizens will pay more in taxes. Democracies are more conducive to growth than other forms of government because they are more likely to accord and protect the rights of individuals, including time-dependent property rights. Olson concludes that democracy is not an inefficient luxury that only rich countries can afford (as many analysts have suggested) but a system that promotes growth in the long run by respecting individual rights. His two chapters on the postcommunist transition to capitalism are especially worth attention.
Related
In a major new work, Benjamin Friedman presents a compelling moral case for growth-oriented economic policies. But even he sometimes needs reminding that the kind of growth matters as much as the amount.
Doubters dating back to Immanuel Kant have predicted the demise of the nation-state. And globalization has staged an assault on state sovereignty, exploiting its vulnerabilities in financial markets and elsewhere. But the nation-state has shown amazing resilience. It will persist, albeit in a greatly changed form, especially in its control of domestic fiscal and monetary policies, foreign economic polices, international business, and war.
Growth is a beseiged deity. An increasing number of economists and policy- makers are becoming convinced that it is imprudent for a country to devote all its efforts toward maximizing the rates of overall growth-and wait for the benefits to trickle down to all sections of the population. Trickle- downism is thus on the wane. Developing countries are now being warned that rapid growth is liable to take too long to alleviate the miseries of the poor, and that for long periods rapid growth may indeed worsen the lot of large numbers-hence they should launch "direct attacks" on poverty.
