Hitler's Austria: Popular Sentiment in the Nazi Era, 1938-1945
A thorough account of the Austrian embrace of Hitler and Nazism, with some interesting parallels to the present. Nazism was especially strong in Carinthia, the province currently governed by Jörg Haider, and it succeeded because many Austrians had grown weary of authoritarian Christian Democratic rule -- just as Haider's far-right Freedom Party now benefits from the electorate's rejection of the Catholic-Socialist spoils system. Bukey also describes the turf wars among bureaucrats, regions, and Nazi factions and highlights the reasons for Hitler's support. Skyrocketing unemployment led many workers to acquiesce to Nazism; even the leading Social Democrat Karl Renner supported the annexation of Austria by Germany. But what was open and ugly then is submerged (although not dead) today: rabid antisemitism rooted in the national psyche. Indeed, antisemitism was much more integral to Nazi support in Austria than in Germany. Having mistakenly expected Italy's surrender to detach Austria from Hitler, the Allies published on November 1, 1943, the declaration that called Austria "the first free country to fall victim" to Hitler -- a total misreading of history that let Austria avoid facing its past after the war. Later, de-Nazification ground to a halt when the postwar government realized that one-third of the population had been either registered Nazis or their dependents.
Related
Austria's elevation of the bigoted Jörg Haider has the rest of Europe fuming. But before rushing to judgment, the continent should review its own record of past wrongs.
France's foreign minister, Hubert Vedrine, is often charged with being anti-American. As his new book shows, however, his brand of realist diplomacy is more subtle and pragmatic than his American critics see it.
The history of the Atlantic Alliance is a history of crises. But we must distinguish between the routine difficulties engendered by Western Europe's dependence on the United States for its security, as well as by the economic interdependence of the allies, and major breakdowns or misunderstandings which reveal not simply an inevitable divergence of interests but dramatically different views of the world and priorities. At the present time, complaints from West European leaders about the effects of high American interest rates on their economies, or about President Reagan's skeptical approach to North-South economic issues, belong in the first category. The current controversy in Europe over nuclear weapons belongs in the second, and now confronts the Alliance with one of its most dangerous tests.

.jpg)
Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.