Populist Seduction in Latin America: The Ecuadorian Experience
The repeated success of populist appeals to the poor -- to the detriment of modernizing political movements -- is not an exclusively Ecuadorian dilemma, but it has recently wrought in Ecuador the most deleterious effects: an elected president's removal, unrest in the army and the indigenous population, a default on bond payments, and a desperate attempt to use dollarization to impose fiscal responsibility. In this timely book, de la Torre examines the rule of Jose Maria Velasco Ibarra (1934-72) and Abdalá Bucaram Ortiz, who was elected in 1996 but removed from office in 1997 on grounds of "mental incapacity" after his reform efforts failed to find allies. Both claimed to represent mestizo Ecuador but ultimately excluded indigenous peoples from their concept of the Ecuadorian nation -- and both were contemptuous of democratic institutions and procedures. De la Torre attributes the populist appeal in Latin America to the weakness of citizenship rights, which in turn limits the poor's power to defend themselves and forces them to depend on protectors. Some politicians have responded to this frustration with inflammatory rhetoric and clientelist networks. Yet by the early 1990s, the emergence of a powerful indigenous movement was already complicating the Ecuadorian scene. All these intricacies, argues de la Torre, make it "premature to offer any optimistic assessment on the future of race relations in Ecuador."
Related
The southern Andes, long known for social volatility and economic disarray, is on the verge of chaos. This need not be cause for fatalism, however. By reengaging with the region, Washington could help turn the political crises plaguing Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia into opportunities for change.
Post-communism has been bad for women in Eastern Europe: their representation, employment, and safety have suffered. America must support women leaders and entrepreneurs for the transition to democracy and capitalism to be complete.
Today’s troubles are real, but not ideological: they relate more to policies than to principles. The postwar order of mutually supporting liberal democracies with mixed economies solved the central challenge of modernity, reconciling democracy and capitalism. The task now is getting the system back into shape.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.