Broadcasting Politics in Japan: NHK and Television News
Beginning with the assumption that the two most powerful institutions affecting citizens in industrial democracies are the state and the mass media, Krauss analyzes in rich detail the unique relationship between Japan's public broadcasting network -- the NHK -- and its political system. Influenced by American ideals of journalistic professionalism and British traditions of state support for objective news, the NHK's neutral reporting unintentionally helped legitimize the postwar democratic Japanese state. Yet the Japanese soon brought their own distinctive twist to reporting by focusing not on the country's leaders but on its bureaucracy. Instead of boring people, such stories interested viewers because the bureaucracy, more than any other institution, impinged so much on daily life. By making the bureaucracy the representative of the state, the NHK rendered politics a faceless, impersonal matter. This book not only advances the West's knowledge about the relationship between journalism and politics in Japan but offers useful lessons about the media that go far beyond the Japanese case.
Related
For a nation whose founding is lost in the mists of antiquity, Japan is in many respects a very new country. Last year we celebrated the hundredth anniversary of the Meiji Restoration, which marked our entry into the modern world. This year the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which I am honored to head, observed its centennial. By contrast, the United States, which is in every respect a young nation, possesses a number of institutions that are far older than many of Japan's. The Department of State, for example, is only a dozen years short of its bicentennial, and Harvard University, with its 333-year old history, is more than three times the age of my own alma mater, Tokyo University, now in its ninety-second year.
A major new work on post-World War II Japan shows how the victorious Allies changed a conservative society unused to defeat and social transformation.
The major events of 1983 in East Asian politics and economics can be looked at from three broad vantage points or planes of abstraction. At the most general level one sees, rather like the movements of tectonic plates on the earth's surface, a slight shift in the center of gravity of U.S. foreign policy from Europe toward Asia. In large part this shift is prompted by a growing realization among the leaders of the United States and Japan that their nations will, for the indefinite future, be paramount in the fundamental sciences and their practical offshoots in microelectronics, biotechnology, fine ceramics, and other new areas of technical development, and that Western Europe will trail in most of these fields and the Soviet Union simply be left behind. The fact that the American President met with the prime minister of Japan three times during 1983 underscores this trend, as did the President's statement in Tokyo in November that "No relationship between any two countries is more important to world peace and prosperity than the relationship between the United States and Japan."
