Interpreting China's Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future
A sober and useful review of Chinese strategy. Apparently resting on English-language sources, this book sums up the views of RAND's chief China-watchers. One key judgment is that by 2020, China will have "many elements of a 1990s-era military inventory" in place. That may sound like a modest achievement, but the authors point out that the regional context and China's niche capabilities in certain areas (including space, information warfare, and some exotic technologies) mean that the results could be unsettling for both China's neighbors and the United States. The second and more important conclusion is that China pursues a "calculative strategy" -- nonideological, restrained, and increasingly international in outlook -- that will nonetheless reflect aspirations for local dominance and prestige. Neither "preemptive containment" nor "preemptive appeasement" are appropriate strategies in response. But even if the authors' preferred approach of "realistic engagement" sounds plausible, what precisely will it entail -- and how will we know if it works?
Related
As economic crisis plunges Asia into chaos, old wounds may reopen. The continent still fears Japan, thanks to its World War II brutalities. By refusing to apologize, Tokyo only makes matters worse. A power vacuum results: an unrepentant Japan will never be allowed to lead a suspicious Asia. Instead, flash points may ignite, and East Asia and even America could be dragged into a war. To defuse tensions, America must push its ally to show remorse and Japan must pay its World War II debts. In turn, China and Korea -- age-old enemies of Japan -- must learn to look forward, not back.
No, it is not a silly question -- merely one that is not asked often enough. Odd as it may seem, the country that is home to a fifth of humankind is consistently overrated as an economy, a world power, and a source of ideas. Economically, China is a relatively unimportant small market; militarily, it is less a global rival like the Soviet Union than a regional menace like Iraq; and politically, its influence is puny. The Middle Kingdom is a middle power. China matters far less than it and most of the West think, and it is high time the West began treating it as such.
The Defense Department's new report on East Asia reads as if the Cold War is ongoing. For Japan, the report signals U.S. acceptance of its ruinous trade deficits. For other Asian nations, it signals the hollowness of American superpower pretensions. The report masks the failure of the Clinton administration's trade policy. By insisting Japan remain a U.S. protectorate, Washington encourages Tokyo's reactionaries. The real threat to Asian security is not China but U.S. distrust of Japan as a true ally. Cold War military power is irrelevant to the economic challenges posed by East Asia's dynamism. Someone should tell the Pentagon.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.