Power and Conflict in the Age of Transparency
How has the spread of democracy, data networks, and information technology affected transparency in world politics? The editors note that if wars are indeed caused by misperception of an opponent's strength, transparency should help avert conflict. Essays by Robert Jervis on the 1815 Concert of Europe and Kenneth Shultz on the signaling capacities of modern democracies usefully explore this insight, while other chapters speculate about how new information technologies -- such as satellite imagery and the Internet -- might change patterns of global conflict and cooperation. Faster and cheaper communications networks and the rise of global media empires may also be speeding up the pace of diplomacy and creating opportunities for new actors on the global stage. In addition, greater transparency might make it easier for states to monitor compliance with international agreements and engage in preventive diplomacy. But the authors acknowledge that more information is not always a blessing; it can in fact confuse government messages and make quiet diplomacy more difficult. The book raises intriguing questions but settles few, missing an opportunity to ask how new information technologies might democratize knowledge and alter the political balance between governments and private groups around the globe.
Related
The nation-state may be obsolete in an internetted world. Increasingly, the resources and threats that matter disregard governments and borders. States are sharing powers that defined their sovereignty with corporations, international bodies, and a proliferating universe of citizens groups. The bond markets must be satisfied or capital will go elsewhere. International involvement in domestic crises is a growth industry. Activists fight battles in cyberspace for every imaginable cause-and the nation-state gives in. The ramifications of this power shift will be seismic.
To date, the Internet economy -- with its emphasis on knowledge and innovation -- has widened the global income gap. Rich nations must help level the playing field in areas from trade to banking to intellectual-property laws. Poor nations, meanwhile, must help themselves by taking steps to promote foreign investment, tackle corruption, and improve education.
The Chinese Communist Party is simultaneously fostering the growth of the Internet and weaving a web of regulations to limit network content and use. But regulations cannot entirely block Internet communication, and the state's previously solid control over information is shifting to the citizens. If a future economic or political crisis spurs a challenge to party rule, this shift in information control may decide the outcome.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.