Can Japan Compete?
In the late 1980s, many American and European firms doubted whether they could ever seriously compete in cost, quality, and novelty with their leading Japanese counterparts -- which were thought to be significantly assisted by the Japanese government. That concern triggered attempts to both emulate Japanese practice and protect against Japanese products. How the tables have turned. Yet readers should not be misled by the book's provocative title. Its authors answer their question resoundingly in the affirmative, but they ask whether Japan has the will to reform both the government's approach to business (less regulation, more support for competition) and corporate management (less emphasis on continuous improvement in all sectors, more attention to strategic planning, specialization, and innovation). Based on a decade's worth of research on Japanese industrial performance, the authors' conclusions strongly contradict the conventional wisdom. In their eyes, heavy government engagement has usually brought failure, or at best mediocrity -- not success. Successes occurred mainly when Japanese firms came under high competitive pressure, despite occasional government-sponsored cartels. The authors doubt that a distinctive form of Japanese capitalism will emerge to offer an alternative route to commercial success.
Related
Over four hundred years ago, the first Occidentals to come to Japan, the Portuguese, wrote letters home stating that the Japanese were different from other Asians and Africans and more like Europeans than any people yet discovered. Visitors from Europe and the Americas are still writing the same kind of letters, but whether the Japanese are really more like Europeans is open to question.
It is hard to be optimistic about Japan's economy, given that Tokyo has already frittered away a decade. But a corner has been turned. The Japanese people increasingly realize that without reform the situation will only get worse. This new awareness was the force behind Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's election in 2001. The bad news is that it may take another decade to get the economy back on track.
US consciousness of the APR focuses mainly on bilateral trade imbalances. "Less understood... is how substantially the balance of economic power within the Asian-Pacific region itself has shifted away from the United States and how that inevitably changes the distribution of political influence in the area".
