Avoiding the Apocalypse: The Future of the Two Koreas
One of the most dramatic events of 2000 was the cordial summit of the two Kims of North and South Korea, the fruits of South Korean President Kim Dae Jung's "sunshine policy" that has thawed the half-century-long freeze. Greater economic, cultural, family, and political contact was tentatively agreed on, but no one knows where it will lead. Noland looks ahead to potential unification and to several possible intermediate points. He summarizes well what limited information is available on the reclusive northern hermit nation and analyzes skillfully both the economic benefits and the political risks of opening up the North Korean economy. Drawing on the unification of Germany, he maps out the lessons for South Koreans (and others) should they need to respond quickly to their northern neighbor's collapse. He sees tremendous difficulties in North Korea due to 50 years of systematic mismanagement under communist rule. But imminent collapse is unlikely as long as Pyongyang plays its cards skillfully -- as it has been doing -- and as long as China fears the unknown alternatives more than the current (albeit unpalatable) regime.
Related
Pacific powers would like Korea to reunify slowly, but the North is soon likely to implode, its economy deteriorating as its weapons of mass destruction accumulate. Rapid reunification would spur economic growth, as in Germany, and reduce regional tensions. South Korea's liberalization of its own economy and strengthening of its civic institutions will prepare it to assist the North. China and Russia may not go along, but Western governments should stop coddling Pyongyang. America should underwrite a united Korea's security, and Japan its finances.
The Clinton administration inherits strained bilateral relations with the leading powers of Asia and no coherent policy for the Asia / Pacific region as a whole. Trade, security and diplomatic style are the overarching challenges and on all three counts prominent Asians are worried. They fear a president bent on building trade walls, bringing home American troops and lecturing on human rights. Yet respect for the United States remains instinctive throughout the region, particularly given convincing progress in rejuvenating the American economy. Asia's quest for economic growth and more democratic government awaits leadership from Washington.
A Question recently posed by a distinguished colleague is central for anyone who earnestly seeks to understand how an entire generation of American political leaders, with the best will in the world, pushed the country onto the slippery slope that led ever downward into the engulfing morass of Indochina. The question is this: "Why did so many intelligent, experienced and humane men in government fail to grasp the immorality of our intervention in Vietnam and the cancerous division it was producing at home, long after this was instinctively evident to their wives and children?"
