The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression
Some scholars see globalization as inevitable and irreversible, whereas others point out that even open and highly integrated international communities have dissolved in the past. James investigates the last great age of globalism, which was destroyed by the Great Depression and political upheaval in the 1930s, to put the debate in historical perspective. He finds evidence for the two most common explanations for economic collapse: rising volume and volatility of capital flows triggered unsustainable booms and busts, and widespread fear of globalization provoked a social and political backlash. But he also offers a third view: People and institutions were overwhelmed by a globalized world's pressures and consequences -- and the institutions that handled economic integration not only were burdened by crises but became the channels through which long-standing political resentment flowed. James acknowledges today's widespread antiglobalization sentiment but concludes that an essential ingredient for 1930s-style economic nationalism is missing today: a respectable intellectual package of antiglobalist policy ideas and a successful national model, such as the Soviet Union or Hitler's Germany. Time will tell whether such a package will re-emerge.
Related
In a major new work, Benjamin Friedman presents a compelling moral case for growth-oriented economic policies. But even he sometimes needs reminding that the kind of growth matters as much as the amount.
Author's Note: The major conclusions of this article will be expanded in "Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises," to be published in September 1971 by Basic Books, Inc., New York.
Doubters dating back to Immanuel Kant have predicted the demise of the nation-state. And globalization has staged an assault on state sovereignty, exploiting its vulnerabilities in financial markets and elsewhere. But the nation-state has shown amazing resilience. It will persist, albeit in a greatly changed form, especially in its control of domestic fiscal and monetary policies, foreign economic polices, international business, and war.
