Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order
Composed of states with diverse cultures and little in the way of shared histories and traditions, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has been the developing world's most successful regional organization, according to this book. Acharya traces in detail the evolution of the "ASEAN way," which stresses consensus, informal rather than legalistic approaches to problem solving, and noninterference in the internal affairs of others. ASEAN leaders could indulge in considerable self-congratulation as long as there was little cause for tension within the group. But the Vietnamese occupation of Cambodia, followed by ASEAN'S expansion to include Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, have severely tested the durability of the "ASEAN way." Moreover, the conflicting territorial problems in the South China Sea have required legal considerations, while ASEAN'S blind eye to Myanmar's internal repression has put it out of step with much of the world, including the European Union. Despite his sympathies for ASEAN, even Acharya has to conclude that the organization seriously needs "to reinvent itself."
Related
Are The Tiananmen Papers authentic? What do they tell us? The truth could overturn an official history that has stymied political reform in China for a decade.
Christopher Patten's new book goes beyond Hong Kong to offer a sensible middle ground in the debate over the link between culture and Asia's rise -- and fall.
For some months, 1966 promised to be a year of significant albeit gradual change in American policy toward Communist China. In a strange and paradoxical fashion, the emotional issues of the Viet Nam War opened the way for the most sober, responsible and even-handed public discussion of China since the Communists came to power. At Congressional hearings and in the mass media, scholars and leaders of opinion have dispassionately calculated the possibilities for change, and Administration leaders have in their customarily guarded language intimated that change was not impossible. Most significant of all, the American public demonstrated a gratifying degree of maturity by forgetting the old passions and asking for only facts and analyses about the new China. Our national mood was increasingly one of believing that with prudence and wisdom it would be possible to work toward gradually incorporating China into responsible world relationships.
