Treason by the Book
Once again Spence has taken hold of a Chinese historical event and transformed it into a fascinating tale that makes vivid the workings of China's security-obsessed imperial system. In 1728, the loyal governor-general of Shaanxi and Sichuan had thrust into his hands a seditious letter that called upon him, as the descendant of a man who had opposed the encroaching barbarians during the Song dynasty, to plot an overthrow of the "alien" Manchu dynasty. That innocent official had to convince the Manchu emperor that he had no treasonous thoughts. All manner of tricks and even torture were employed to test the loyalties of a circle of suspects, and the writings and the libraries of scholars were minutely examined for any hints of treason. To show his magnanimity, the emperor eventually pardoned the letter writer, but the succeeding emperor had him executed. Spence makes clear the fine line Chinese scholars had to walk between loyalty and treason as they fulfilled their duty to admonish the emperor for any moral lapses that might displease heaven -- and hence jeopardize the dynasty's legitimacy.
Related
Are The Tiananmen Papers authentic? What do they tell us? The truth could overturn an official history that has stymied political reform in China for a decade.
Christopher Patten's new book goes beyond Hong Kong to offer a sensible middle ground in the debate over the link between culture and Asia's rise -- and fall.
For some months, 1966 promised to be a year of significant albeit gradual change in American policy toward Communist China. In a strange and paradoxical fashion, the emotional issues of the Viet Nam War opened the way for the most sober, responsible and even-handed public discussion of China since the Communists came to power. At Congressional hearings and in the mass media, scholars and leaders of opinion have dispassionately calculated the possibilities for change, and Administration leaders have in their customarily guarded language intimated that change was not impossible. Most significant of all, the American public demonstrated a gratifying degree of maturity by forgetting the old passions and asking for only facts and analyses about the new China. Our national mood was increasingly one of believing that with prudence and wisdom it would be possible to work toward gradually incorporating China into responsible world relationships.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.