Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy
A veteran of counterterrorism work at the CIA, Pillar wants less attention paid to glamorous threats such as weapons of mass destruction and more care given to the steady, incremental jobs done each day to track and contain the problems that will never really go away. Pillar thinks a "tough" policy on terrorism is often too simplistic, and he counsels less reliance on force and more attention to international cooperation and diplomatic prevention. He therefore suggests that counterterrorism concerns should emerge from their compartment to become mainstream elements in U.S. foreign policy thinking. But this book is not meant for those looking for advice about U.S. policy toward Iran, Afghanistan, or any other state. The book's strength is its nuanced sense of how Washington's counterterrorism policy actually works, day in and day out.
Related
The specter of weapons of mass destruction being used against America looms larger today than at any time since the Cuban missile crisis. The World Trade Center bombing scarcely hints at the enormity of the danger. America is prepared only for conventional terrorism, not a nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons catastrophe. With the right approach and organization, however, the United States can be ready. Herewith a plan to reorganize the U.S. government to ensure that it can handle the threats of the next century.
By stressing unilateralism over cooperation, preemption over prevention, and firepower over staying power, the Bush administration has alienated the United States' natural allies and disengaged from many of the world's most pressing problems. To restore U.S. global standing--which is essential in checking the spread of lethal weapons and winning the war on terrorism--the next Democratic president must recognize the obvious: that means are as important as ends.
The failure to prevent the September 11, 2001, attacks or find Iraqi WMD have put intelligence at the center of this year's presidential campaign. The key to better performance, however, lies not in major reforms but in the character and sense of responsible officials.
