Reinventing Khomeini: The Struggle for Reform in Iran
Ever since Max Weber introduced the theory of the charismatic revolutionary leader whose appeal must at some point be "routinized" by new rules, scholars have sought to explain how revolutions wind down. Here Bromberg makes three points regarding Iran. First, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's political strategy was more nuanced -- even at times more contradictory -- than scholars often realize. Second, all major political contenders in Iran claim to be true to Khomeini's message. Third, their differences have been institutionalized and epitomized in today's awkward cohabitation between President Mohammad Khatami and Khomeini's official successor, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khameinei. The resulting "dissonant" institutionalization is likely to continue. Reinventing Khomeini, awash with the argot of sociological theory and many Iranian names and terms, is not an easy read; a chronology, a glossary, and short biographical sketches would have helped. Yet it provides a useful road map to Iran's ongoing "routinization of the charisma."
Related
In Iran today, defiant new movements are blossoming. They put the country on the cutting edge of the Islamic world on issues ranging from religious reform and cultural expression to women's rights. The theocratic regime that seized power in 1979 is unlikely to survive, but the driving force behind that revolution is prompting ordinary Iranians to go out and get what they need for themselves.
For months, commentators have assumed that Iran's Green Movement was finished, but the history of political turmoil in twentieth-century Iran suggests otherwise.
Tehran's policies reflect only one interpretation of Shiite theology. Returning to the pre-1979 consensus among Shiite religious leaders may be the key to resolving the crisis in Iran.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.