Diplomacy in the Middle East: The International Relations of Regional and Outside Powers
The recent focus on Arab-Israeli relations has helped foster the belief that Middle East diplomacy can be reduced to that single dimension. It cannot. As this useful volume of essays argues, the foreign policies of Middle Eastern states are guided by various and complex motivations. These factors owe as much to history, geography, domestic factors, regional alliances, or Western influence as they do to the conflict with Israel. The imperatives of checking rival ambitions, maximizing economic opportunities, and seeking to build alliances have constantly shaped the regional landscape. The book thereby shows the breadth of this "international relations sub-system," in which Arab countries -- as well as Iran, Turkey, and Israel -- must deal with one another. It treats the foreign policy of all Middle Eastern states in addition to the four outside states that have played key roles in shaping the region: the United Kingdom, France, Russia, and the United States. In short, it should revive interest in the underlying motivations of regional actors at a time when international events may lead to significant realignments among Syria, Iran, Iraq, and the Palestinians.
Related
The end of the Cold War and the Persian Gulf conflict sparked the Madrid conference, formal peace between Israel and Jordan, and some autonomy for the West Bank. But those days have gone. Even if Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu had lost the election, Arab countries would still be more preoccupied with economic problems, internal political challenges, and security threats from Iraq and Iran. But the end of the era of treaties need not be the end of the peace process. The plo should discourage violence against Israel, and Israel should disrupt Syrian support for Hezbollah. The United States must maintain the principle of territory for peace.
For decades, Israel has maintained an "opaque" nuclear posture -- neither confirming nor denying that it possesses nuclear weapons. The time has come for Israel to reconsider the policy of nuclear ambiguity. It can do so without jeopardizing the nation's security.
One of the tactics Israel has used in responding to terrorism has been to seek out and kill individual enemies. Now Washington has started doing the same. The United States and Israel face different circumstances, however, and so the Bush administration should think twice before proceeding.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.