Religion and Humane Global Governance
An evocative call for a new global order built around social justice and human fulfillment. Falk wants to shift the debate over global governance from its functional focus, which merely asks how to reform existing institutions, to a values-based approach that seeks to harness the social forces of an emergent global civil society. This vision still acknowledges the central role of states, but it requires an expanded rule of law to protect basic human rights. For this to happen, Falk believes, the post-Enlightenment divide between politics and religion must end. If claims of human rights and social justice are to be truly universal, they must be rooted in not just government-level, Western-dominated ideas but in non-Western religious movements, postcolonial rediscoveries of identity, and transnational social groups. Falk is aware that religious movements and civilizational impulses can divide and fragment as often as they unify. But mutual engagement and respect, he claims, can unearth deeply buried identities that affirm a common humanity.
Related
The international adoption trade is booming, as more families in the West adopt more babies from developing countries. But it has spawned a sordid black market as well, in which children are bought or abducted and sold. The best way to stop the trafficking is not to ban adoptions from countries that tolerate corrupt rings, but to strengthen the underdeveloped multilateral legal regime that regulates adoptions around the planet.
Although questions of implementation remain, the new Iraqi constitution makes Islam the law of the land. This need not mean trouble for Iraq's women, however. Sharia is open to a wide range of interpretations, some quite egalitarian. If Washington still hopes for a liberal order in Iraq, it should start working with progressive Muslim scholars to advance women's rights through religious channels.
Daniel Goldhagen's book on the Holocaust--condemning the German "eliminationist" mindset toward Jews--has become an international bestseller and a datum in German-American relations. Pity, because it is a simplistic, monocausal, and unhistorical explanation of one of the most complex horrors in history. For Goldhagen, as for the Nazis, Hitler is Germany.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.