Ahead of the Curve? U.N. Ideas and Global Challenges
This book, the first volume of the United Nations' Intellectual History Project, seeks to map the economic and social ideas promoted by the organization since 1945. Although the U.N.'s most visible work has been in the arenas of geopolitics and peacekeeping, its enduring impact may be in spreading ideas about economics, human rights, and social development. The authors note, for example, that nine Nobel Prize winners in economics have spent substantial parts of their careers in the U.N. system. Debates over decolonization and human rights during the U.N.'s early years shifted their focus in the 1960s to social and economic development and later to basic human needs. In recent decades, U.N. world conferences have become a dominant vehicle for spreading ideas on population, food, the environment, and women's rights. The authors only scratch the surface of the important interplay between politics, power, institutions, and ideas. But they show that the U.N. has provided an institutional space in which long-term policy agendas can be constructed. How these ideas shape national interests and government commitments, however, still needs to be determined.
Related
Its diplomatic debacles in the past few years demonstrate one thing: the United Nations cannot mediate. It has too many mouths to speak with one voice, lacks the resources needed for political leverage, and diminishes the credibility of its own promises by its incoherence. Those problems are ingrained in the nature of international organizations, and no amount of revamping the United Nations will correct them. Instead, the United Nations should encourage self-interested states to mediate those conflicts they have the best chances of resolving. That is the best way to salvage the organization's steadily diminishing prestige.
A blurring of roles at the United Nations has badly tarnished the organization's prestige. When it comes to the use of force, leave the secretary general out of it.
The United Nations is only an instrument of sovereign states occasionally useful in specific crises. When used hastily or inappropriately, it risks internationalizing and prolonging local conflicts.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.