Imperial Ends: The Decay, Collapse, and Revival of Empires
The twentieth century was cruel to European empires. But the new century still bears their marks, especially in the case of the still-decaying Soviet empire. Here Motyl brings a fresh eye to the politics of imperial decay and collapse. Empires often follow a predictable course of rise and decline, but Motyl maintains that an organizational pathology inherent in these hierarchical systems makes decay inexorable. Motyl is especially intrigued by variations in historical trajectories and the sources of imperial resurgence. Focusing on the Habsburg, Ottoman, Romanov, Wilhelmine, and Soviet experiences, Motyl argues that postimperial revival is most likely when the core state remains strong and the peripheral territories remain weak and divided. In the Soviet case, eastern Europe has largely escaped the reach of Moscow, whereas the former Soviet republics remain precariously positioned between independence and informal empire. Motyl's concluding prediction is gloomy: the collapse of any revived Russian empire is likely, and instability and conflict in the former Soviet area
are virtually certain.
Related
"The historical nature and development of Finnish-Russian relations... should tell us not only some things about Finland but also some seldom-recognized things about Russian foreign policy under Stalin".
Early on August 22, 1939, the world was startled to learn from an announcement in the Soviet press that German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop would arrive in Moscow on the following day to sign a nonaggression pact. Equipped with instructions from Adolf Hitler authorizing him to sign both a treaty and a secret protocol that would enter into force as soon as signed by the two countries (rather than when ratified later), Ribbentrop left for Moscow that evening. At the airport, the German delegation was met by deputy commissar for foreign affairs, Vladimir P. Potemkin, who earlier that year had declined an invitation to meet with British Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax.
Eurasia is the axial supercontinent. It is home to most of the world's politically assertive states and all the historical pretenders to global power. Accounting for 75 percent of the world's population, 60 percent of its output, and 75 percent of its energy resources, Eurasia's potential power overshadows even America's. For these reasons, the United States should begin paving the way to a transcontinental security system that will ensure Eurasia's future is more peaceful than its past.
