Islam and Salvation in Palestine: The Islamic Jihad Movement
Hatina offers a measured, dispassionate account of the Palestinian extremist group Islamic Jihad, which emerged in the 1980s and claims to have started the first intifada in 1987. Tiny by comparison with Hamas, it is even more radical. Islamic Jihad's "internal charter" (translated selections of which are found in a useful appendix) views Palestine as sacred, and armed struggle as the only means to liberate it. The struggle is directed against "the triple heresy and oppression of the West, the Arab regimes, and Israel."
It lauds martyrdom (and thus suicide bombings) and rejects any negotiation or truce with the enemy. Islamic Jihad has consistently embraced Iran's hard-liners and has received support from Tehran. The ideology of Islamic Jihad and the challenges that it poses to both the Palestine Liberation Organization (and the Palestinian Authority) and Hamas are well presented. One might have included some indication of Islamic Jihad's numerical strength, but the only numbers offered are for student elections at the Islamic University in Gaza -- which give Islamic Jihad 4-10 percent, compared to 60 percent for Hamas.
Related
The American imperium in the Arab-Muslim world has hatched a monster; primacy has begotten its nemesis. Pax Americana is here to stay -- but so too is the resistance to it, the uneasy mix in those lands of the need for the foreigner's order and the urge to lash out against it. George W. Bush, who grew up far removed from foreign places, must now take his country on a journey into an alien and difficult world.
Thinking of modern jihad as simply a cultural extension of Islam is a common, and unfortunate, mistake. Two new books by Gilles Kepel and Olivier Roy offer better historical and sociological explanations, but they are only a start.
In his article "Europe's Angry Muslims" (July/August 2005), Robert Leiken argues that European Muslims are "distinct, cohesive, and bitter." He later writes that Islamist terrorist groups should not be compared with marginal European terrorist groups because Islamist terrorists have a "social base" from which to operate. The implied claim that all European Muslims are or could be supporters of terrorists (if they are not terrorists themselves) needs to be answered.
