Statecraft: Strategies for a Changing World
Reflections on diplomacy and national security by the former British prime minister. The book restates Thatcher's long-held beliefs in a strong military, resolute statecraft, and alliance partnership with America. In her view, the 1990s provide a warning to the United Kingdom and the other Western countries. After winning the Cold War, the democracies let down their guard; they focused on human rights and spent less on defense, let their intelligence-gathering efforts slip, and listened to liberal politicians who believed that globalization would bring global peace. In response, Thatcher urges a return to the exercise of state power in pursuit of the national interest. But her essays are not simple affirmations of realpolitik statecraft. Like Ronald Reagan, Thatcher has a strong moral commitment to democracy, liberty, the rule of law, and other Western ideals; her world view embraces both power politics and democratic community. Indeed, she often sounds like a conservative Wilsonian. She urges her compatriots to stand firm in the defense of British values and interests -- making the case, for example, for why the United Kingdom should reject the euro. But there is also a message to the United States to not "go wobbly" in global leadership and the defense of freedom.
Related
During the Cold War, the ever-present Soviet threat helped keep the West united. More recently, however, attempts to mend the transatlantic rift by pointing to present dangers have only deepened the cultural divide. Leaders on both sides of the Atlantic must accept that "the West" has now split into European and American halves. But both sides still need each other -- now more than ever.
Not for the first time, agricultural trade has become a live and contentious issue in Atlantic relations. Questions of access and protection have been subjects of constant concern to American farmers and traders since the establishment of Europe's Common Agricultural Policy 25 years ago. Now, though, under the pressures of surplus stocks of grain and falling farm incomes, there is a new area of contention--competitive subsidies designed to win or ensure shares in an erratic world market. Months of negotiation have failed to resolve the issue and neither the European Community nor the United States has shown any sign of being ready to sacrifice what both define as legitimate economic interests.
Despite the myriad setbacks of recent months, the U.S.-European alliance is not doomed. But repairing it will require a strategic overhaul no less bold than that which followed the end of the Cold War. The key to today's transatlantic divide is not power but purpose. To revive and revamp the alliance, therefore, the United States and the European Union must forge a new grand strategy capable of meeting the great challenges of the era: expanding the Euro-Atlantic community and stabilizing the greater Middle East.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.