Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda
Barnett, an academic, was attached to the U.S. Mission to the United Nations in the months surrounding the Rwandan genocide in April 1994. Using an organizational-ethics framework, he assesses the UN's moral responsibility for the ensuing holocaust. He first sketches the world body's shifting role following the Cold War and then dissects who said and did what about Rwanda in 1993-94, pointing out the sins of commission and omission by the Security Council, the Secretariat, its Department of Peacekeeping Operations, and the latter's field force, the un Assistance Mission for Rwanda. His theme is the moral universe of the UN and the particular ways its bureaucratic and political cultures construct reality. At every level except that of the field operation, he finds a pattern of "willful ignorance and indifference" toward Rwanda and a prioritizing of institutional interests over the obligations set forth in the 1948 Genocide Convention. These are not new findings, but Barnett develops them in a rigorous if rather repetitious way, drawing on interviews with key participants.
Related
The idea of holding national leaders to account for waging wars of aggression has moral appeal and historical pedigree. But whether the International Criminal Court can try such cases is a thornier issue.
The Human Rights organs of the United Nations have been-to use a typically American term-great on production but poor in distribution. Since the adoption of the Charter in 1945, making the promotion of human rights and fundamental freedoms a purpose of the organization, the members have produced a cornucopia of papers proclaiming principles and goals which almost no state dares contradict publicly, but which few observe conscientiously, and which fewer still embrace to the point of allowing their practices to be inspected.
Dealing with today's threats requires broad, deep, and sustained global cooperation. Thus the states of the world must create a collective security system to prevent terrorism, strengthen nonproliferation, and bring peace to war-torn areas, while also promoting human rights, democracy, and development. And the UN must go through its most radical overhaul yet.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.