Egypt and American Foreign Assistance, 1952-1958
With this book and the much earlier Economic Aid and American Policy Toward Egypt, 1955-1982 by William J. Burns, we have two studies that treat the role of economic aid as an instrument of American foreign policy toward Egypt. Alterman offers a detailed assessment of the financing, staffing, strategy, and performance of the several different U.S. aid efforts during those years, ranging from the largely forgotten Egyptian-American Rural Improvement Service to the much better known negotiations concerning the building of the Aswan High Dam. Alterman maintains that the Egyptian government during these years was very serious about the pressing need for accelerated development, even if it remained ambivalent about foreign aid and foreign involvement. Still, the economic results, although not to be dismissed, were not apparent enough to sustain a partnership. In the end, the Cold War and regional pressures proved more powerful in determining the foreign policies of countries.
Related
The United States is spreading its aid and efforts too thin in the developing world. It should focus on a small number of "pivotal states": countries whose fate determines the survival and success of the surrounding region and ultimately the stability of the international system. The list should include Mexico, Brazil, Algeria, Egypt, South Africa, Turkey, India, Pakistan, and Indonesia. A discriminating strategy for shoring up the developing world is a wise way to address traditional security threats and new transnational issues; it might be thought of as the new, improved domino theory. If effective, it could forestall the move in Congress to wipe out nearly all foreign aid.
Israel and Egypt's cold peace has turned arctic. Jerusalem and Cairo are clashing over nuclear disarmament, other Arab states' ties to Israel, the stability of the Mubarak regime, and the peace process. The strains stem from Israel's and Egypt's competing visions of a new Middle East, which they both hope to lead. With U.S.-Egyptian relations also on the rocks, these tensions threaten the entire Middle East peace process.
DURING recent Congressional debates on aid legislation many harsh things were said about the United Arab Republic and its President. One Senator stated that "Col. Abdel Nasser . . . has been responsible more than any other single individual for keeping the political cauldron boiling in the arid, strife-torn Middle East . . . pouring oil on whatever brush fires break out." President Nasser has been equally sharp and critical. Early in 1964 he publicly described American foreign policy toward the Arab world as "not based on justice but on the support and consolidation of the base of aggression, Israel, and we cannot, under any circumstances, accept it."

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.