Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry
The unprecedented number of civilian contractors working closely with the U.S. military in Iraq has attracted considerable attention in recent months. But this development merely reflects a larger trend toward reliance on the private sector, including the increasing use of off-the-shelf technologies and a growing readiness to contract out support systems to civilians. In the most thorough analysis yet of this phenomenon, now worth some $100 billion a year globally, Singer acknowledges that this practice can improve efficiency in the military but also raises questions about the tensions between patriotism and the profit motive and the implications of having key personnel who approach danger differently than professional soldiers. Private companies are even taking on combat roles, and they often heavily influence developing-world conflicts, most notably in Africa -- although they do not always choose their clients with care.
Related
In The Assassins' Gate, George Packer presents a searing account of the Bush administration's failures in Iraq -- and of his own disillusionment as a liberal hawk who supported toppling Saddam Hussein.
In Supreme Command, Eliot Cohen shoots down the myth that politicians should not meddle with the military during wartime. Focusing on four great civilian leaders, he shows that the opposite is true: disasters can result when politicians are not involved enough.
The basic assumptions of U.S. policy toward the Gulf demand rethinking. The Pentagon pays up to $60 billion a year to protect the import of $30 billion worth of oil that would flow anyway. Playing the role of regional hegemon ties America to troubled regimes and leaves it out on a limb, while allies sit back. Washington must hedge against inevitable political change in the region by spreading the burden and the say, reversing arms proliferation, and encouraging the Gulf states to come up with some security of their own.
