Fascists
This has been a good year for students of fascism. Soon after the release Robert Paxton's excellent study of fascism's historical development comes Mann's sociological analysis of six European countries where fascism-defined here as "the pursuit of a transcendent and cleansing nation-statism through paramilitarism"-became dominant: Italy, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Romania, and Spain. There are no radically new vistas in this book, but it is an eminently satisfying and absorbing account by a powerful and erudite mind, with Mann's exceptional analytical and theoretical skills on full display. Although Mann is critical of class and economic development theories, he addresses the influence of class and interest conflicts, as well the identity of the Fascists, the weakness of their opponents, and the impact of World War I and the Great Depression. Unfortunately, he considers no counterexample such as France, where fascism existed but did not prevail. With regard to a possible revival, Mann dismisses the notion of "Islamic fascism," which lacks the key ingredients of nationalism and a strong state. He contends that the various elements that give rise to fascism are "almost never found together" and are unlikely to occur soon-unless, that is, the United States and its allies continue "besmirching the attractions of mild and democratic nation-statism through their capitalist exploitation, American military imperialism, and widening north-south inequalities."
Related
Many African nations seem hopelessly destitute and anarchic. European nations have the moral obligation and the colonial expertise to give wise succor.
Certain moments in the lives of peoples represent milestones in their centuries-long journeys. There were several such moments in the process of establishing the principles of self-managed socialist democracy in the multinational federal state of Jugoslavia.
Seventeen months of intricate negotiation involving the four powers responsible for Germany, the two German states and the North Atlantic and Warsaw Treaty alliances have finally yielded a Berlin agreement. It is the first major East-West accord in Europe since the Austrian State Treaty in 1955 and suggests that old-fashioned diplomacy still has its virtues. The agreement's provisions, which are far better than Western foreign offices dared hope when the negotiations began, regulate the thorniest aspects of the Berlin problem, notably the access issue. But they do not solve the problem in the sense of establishing a new status for the city. Indeed, whether the agreement holds up at all depends on whether the present détente in Europe continues. Experience with Soviet policy has taught that this is not predictable. One result is, however, certain: the agreement compels the West to come fully to terms soon with the second German state. The German Democratic Republic is becoming, as Alice might put it, permanenter and permanenter.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.