A Democratic Audit of the European Union
It is with great anticipation that one turns to a book that aims to carry out an "audit" of the European Union to find out just how democratic its institutions are and to determine what can be done to make up for any "democratic deficit," by making its institutions more responsive to the peoples of member states. Lord, the Jean Monnet Professor at the University of Leeds, cannot be accused of a lack of seriousness, but the scrupulousness of his methodology and the evenhandedness of his meticulous approach make for maddeningly difficult and inconclusive reading. Indeed, the final chapter warns against "sweeping generalizations for and against the existence of a democratic deficit." Amen. But although there is undoubtedly much wisdom in Lord's multiple findings, one wonders who, except other social scientists, will find the time to separate the really important ones from the others or, having read the book, the energy to do something about them. (This raises one further question: The EU is one of the few really inspiring political innovations of the last half-century, so why is the literature about it so often soporific?)
Related
Many African nations seem hopelessly destitute and anarchic. European nations have the moral obligation and the colonial expertise to give wise succor.
Certain moments in the lives of peoples represent milestones in their centuries-long journeys. There were several such moments in the process of establishing the principles of self-managed socialist democracy in the multinational federal state of Jugoslavia.
Seventeen months of intricate negotiation involving the four powers responsible for Germany, the two German states and the North Atlantic and Warsaw Treaty alliances have finally yielded a Berlin agreement. It is the first major East-West accord in Europe since the Austrian State Treaty in 1955 and suggests that old-fashioned diplomacy still has its virtues. The agreement's provisions, which are far better than Western foreign offices dared hope when the negotiations began, regulate the thorniest aspects of the Berlin problem, notably the access issue. But they do not solve the problem in the sense of establishing a new status for the city. Indeed, whether the agreement holds up at all depends on whether the present détente in Europe continues. Experience with Soviet policy has taught that this is not predictable. One result is, however, certain: the agreement compels the West to come fully to terms soon with the second German state. The German Democratic Republic is becoming, as Alice might put it, permanenter and permanenter.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.