Euros and Europeans: Monetary Integration and the European Model of Society
An "interdisciplinary transnational team" of academics and researchers has produced this fine multifaceted balance sheet of the European Monetary Union, with special emphasis on the fate of the "European Social Model" of the welfare state, the "rigidities" of which have collided with the politics of the highly independent European Central Bank. The editors stress the resilience of the social model and suggest that the monetary union as such could actually increase the autonomy of European economic policy from the forces of globalization and thus enable Europe to overcome high unemployment. The authors, however, also stress the European Central Bank's steadfast defense of price stability and its success in subordinating growth and employment to price stability. The country chapters, meanwhile, often reach unorthodox conclusions. The editors conclude by noting the resilience of the European social model, but they worry that continuing low growth and high unemployment "might create conditions for a war of attrition that would sap the European model by stealth."
Related
Not much attention was paid in March 1985, when the European Council, whose members include the chiefs of state and government of the 12 member states, decided that it should constitute a single market by 1992. After all, the European Community had been established in 1957 with the goal of a common market, and many people believed that the goal had been reached; tariffs within the Community had been abolished, a common external tariff put in place and a controversial common agricultural policy instituted.
With the EU's addition of ten new members and a likely slowdown in U.S. productivity growth, Europe has a chance to overtake the U.S. economy. To actually do so, however, it must boost its competitiveness with some much-needed reforms.
What is happening in the political and economic arena in Jugoslavia today should not be haughtily dismissed as the result of disruptive ideological disagreement among self-righteous Marxist factions. Nor is it a reflection of the evil influence of foreign propaganda, Communist or anti-Communist. Nor has it grown out of mischievous activity of reactionary forces eager to achieve the restoration of the old régime.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.