Drugs and Democracy in Latin America: The Impact of U.S. Policy; War and Drugs in Colombia
The Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) has long maintained that U.S. international drug policy not only fails to affect the price and availability of illicit drugs on U.S. streets but also causes severe "collateral damage" in target countries. This well-documented and up-to-date study contends that U.S. policies export law enforcement programs that replace due process and fairness with disproportionate mandatory sentencing, undermine favorable trends toward civilian control of military forces, foment popular unrest, and hurt the environment. As a result of the "balloon effect," such policies have actually spread the drug trade into more and more regions and countries. Recognized successes -- for example, in strengthening criminal investigation capacities, reforming police units, and capturing drug kingpins -- are outweighed by strategic failure. The report is more effective in deflating U.S. claims of victory in the war on drugs than it is in providing alternatives potentially attractive to current policymakers. Still, this collection of program assessments and case studies is probing, informative, and deeply disturbing.
The International Crisis Group report concurs with WOLA's conclusion that Colombia continues to flood the United States (and, increasingly, Europe) with cocaine, and that aerial spraying, even when effective locally, is not likely to keep pace with the geographic mobility of traffickers. (Alarmingly, the financial coffers of armed insurgents are deep enough to continue fighting indefinitely.) The Crisis Group is less ambivalent than WOLA about beefing up Colombian security forces, but it shares WOLA's preference for alternative rural development strategies and urges a scientific approach to demand-side "harm reduction measures," possibly including partial legalization of soft drugs, to take the wind out of the criminal black market.
Related
U.S. officials and national security experts chronically exaggerate foreign threats, suggesting that the world is scarier and more dangerous than ever. But that is just not true. From the U.S. perspective, at least, the world today is remarkably secure, and Washington needs a foreign policy that reflects that reality.
The American imperium in the Arab-Muslim world has hatched a monster; primacy has begotten its nemesis. Pax Americana is here to stay -- but so too is the resistance to it, the uneasy mix in those lands of the need for the foreigner's order and the urge to lash out against it. George W. Bush, who grew up far removed from foreign places, must now take his country on a journey into an alien and difficult world.
This article appears in the Foreign Affairs eBook, "The U.S. vs. al Qaeda: A History of the War on Terror." Now available for purchase.
If an influenza pandemic struck today, borders would close, the global economy would shut down, international vaccine supplies and health-care systems would be overwhelmed, and panic would reign. To limit the fallout, the industrialized world must create a detailed response strategy involving the public and private sectors.
