Korean Attitudes Toward the United States: Changing Dynamics
This volume, the product of a conference organized by Georgetown University, examines rising anti-Americanism in South Korea from multiple perspectives. There are Marxists whose views about advanced capitalism and imperialism have stimulated paranoid perceptions of U.S. involvement in every aspect of Korean life. On the right, there are traditionalists who believe that American culture is destroying ancient Korean values. And then there are opportunists who are quick to jump on any incident involving U.S. soldiers or problems related to U.S. military installments. The authors make clear that there is no simple explanation for rising anti-Americanism. Although many observers are quick to blame Washington's policies, the more important factors may be existential: the United States is too rich, too powerful, too idealistically virtuous, too knowledgeable and sophisticated--all prompting a need among Koreans to strike back. In any case, the intensity of anti-Americanism has receded somewhat thanks to the failure of South Korea's "sunshine policy" to transform relations with the North -- reminding South Koreans that a U.S. role is still crucial.
Related
Ahmed Rashid has it wrong. The Taliban's days are, mercifully, numbered.
Nixon was not the only one who went to China; Ronald McDonald is there now, too. McDonald's triumphed -- in a cultural zone where many adults think fried beef patties taste bizarre -- by catering to China's pampered only children, the so-called little emperors and empresses. The "Golden Arches" have become part of the landscape of Beijing and Hong Kong. But is McDonald's trampling local culture in the name of a bland, homogeneous world order? Not really. Global capitalism pushes one way, and local consumers push right back. Herewith, a parable of globalization.
The Dalai Lama's international campaign against China has pushed Beijing to modernize Tibet, resulting in an influx of non-Tibetans seeking economic opportunity. If the Dalai Lama wants to preserve Tibet as a homeland, he must either acquiesce in violence by militants or compromise. He will resist either course, so the United States should facilitate negotiations. Full autonomy is out, but the Dalai Lama can obtain a greater emphasis on the Tibetan language and a larger number of positions for Tibetans in the administration.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.