The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War
The faux-Ciceronian toga party so beloved of West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd is a perennial staple of American political discourse. We have lost the sacred wisdom of the Founders, warn generations of American doomsayers, and their virtue has departed with it. Soon, Liberty herself will flee. It is perhaps heartless to begrudge Bacevich the use of a literary form he so clearly enjoys. Still, it is a pity that he does. Lively insights and the elements of a useful and important reading of the recent history of U.S. strategic thought peep through this book's vast, drifty expanses of oratorical bromides like crocuses in a snowbank. Bacevich argues that militaristic thinking wedded to utopianism is turning the United States into a crusader state, threatening liberty at home and promising endless adventures abroad. His account of modern militarism grounds such thinking in the Pentagon's response to defeat in Vietnam, and his fine grasp of the modern history of American strategic thought gives weight to his analysis. Lurking in here, too, is the germ of a less conventional critique: a serious Catholic attack on contemporary evangelical culture, with its easy acceptance of gross materialism and an unthinking patriotism that verges on chauvinism. Unfortunately, with all the toga shaking, these themes never quite get the systematic and thoughtful treatment they deserve; more matter with less art would make a better book.
Related
By toppling Saddam Hussein, the Bush administration has liberated and empowered Iraq's Shiite majority and has helped launch a broad Shiite revival that will upset the sectarian balance in Iraq and the Middle East for years to come. This development is rattling some Sunni Arab governments, but for Washington, it could be a chance to build bridges with the region's Shiites, especially in Iran.
The debates over Kosovo blurred the old divisions between liberals and conservatives, but they did not rise above an even older split in American politics and foreign policy: the enduring divide between a hawkish South and a dovish North. Regional differences based on culture and values have made Greater New England the heartland of opposition to foreign wars and the U.S. military establishment since the 1700s; they have also made the South a bastion of interventionism. All too often, the regional divides over U.S. foreign policy have just been a reprise of the Civil War -- and they are a recipe for paralysis.
For a decade, the United States has exported its gang problem, sending Central American-born criminals back to their homelands -- without warning local governments. The result has been an explosive rise of vicious, transnational gangs that now threaten the stability of the region's fragile democracies. As Washington fiddles, the gangs are growing, spreading north into Mexico and back to the United States.
