This Was Not Our War: Bosnian Women Reclaiming the Peace; Good People in an Evil Time: Portraits of Complicity and Resistance in the Bosnian War
Books that report the experiences of people who have been the victims of history and survived -- sometimes by their own efforts, sometimes by chance, sometimes by shady compromises -- rarely get serious review treatment. They should. Hunt, who was President Bill Clinton's ambassador to Austria, has put together interviews with 26 Bosnian women. They come from different backgrounds but share an emotional strength and a generosity of spirit, a dignity and humanity, that together make the case for a greater role for women in the politics of their societies -- and make the rest of the world's hesitancy to intervene to defend human rights in Bosnia very hard to justify. Broz -- a granddaughter of Marshal Tito who worked as a physician in Bosnia during the war -- has collected interviews that, as the anthropologist Laurie Kain Hart points out in her introduction, provide a description of a "full social universe" and an account of "social networks through which people survive when there is no public space and no public protection or resource" -- when all that is left amid a Hobbesian state of nature are the "rituals of hospitality" and the importance of the home. Hart's account of Svetlana Broz's career and experiences is shattering, and what emerges from the testimonies is a picture of "nationalism as a sickness" and a clear sense of the difficulty of re-creating unity "in a traumatized and segmented society."
Related
Charles Kupchan ("Independence for Kosovo," November/December 2005) is correct when he asserts that countries such as Russia have no real interest in Kosovo as a territory; Kosovo as a precedent, however, is another matter. Governments from Baku to Beijing and separatist regimes from Trans-Dniestria to the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus are taking a keen interest in how questions of sovereignty and territorial integrity are handled in the determination of Kosovo's final status.
On June 29, after almost five months of discussion and preparation, the East German Communist régime denounced an agreement for public debates to be held in both German states between its spokesmen and the leaders of West Germany's opposition Social Democratic Party. The plan for a high-level confrontation, the first of its kind since Germany was partitioned at the end of the Second World War, was the result of an East German initiative. It had aroused intense interest and some exaggerated hopes among Germans on both sides of the Iron Curtain.
The crisis over Cuba and the Chinese invasion of India have had their salutary lessons for many nations and many political leaders-for none perhaps more than the neutralists. They have spoken up positively, as before, for peace and negotiation, against blocs and power politics. But what they have seen has attested to their relative inability to influence the course of events, or even to maintain solidarity in their own ranks, when the big powers are taking crucial decisions and the global strategic balance is at stake. A more pertinent question is whether, and how, the neutrals can safeguard their own vital interests.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.