Deadly Connections: States That Sponsor Terrorism
Byman's is the most authoritative account yet of the link between states and international terrorism. Thoroughly researched and carefully argued, Deadly Connections explores the motivations, limits, and consequences of the state sponsorship of terrorist groups -- and draws lessons about what the world can do about it. Byman argues that states back terrorist groups primarily for strategic reasons: to influence neighbors, topple regimes, counter U.S. hegemony, or advance ideological objectives. Pakistan, for example, backed radical groups to undermine governance in Kashmir, whereas Iran backed Hezbollah to disrupt the Middle East peace process. Byman finds variation in the types of support that states provide, ranging from the active efforts of Iran to the passive neglect of Saudi Arabia. He is equally systematic in identifying the strategies that states have employed in attempts to reduce support for terrorism. The account ends with the successful case of deterring Libya's support for terrorism and soberly concludes that states can be coerced into ending their support for terrorist groups but that the process will be long and arduous. Sound policy must combine coercion with a promise of passage back into the international community -- not an earthshaking judgment, but still a useful message to policymakers.
Related
The first engagement in the new war on terrorism -- with Osama bin Ladin in Afghanistan -- poses severe challenges for the United States. Rooting out bin Ladin's network will require military success in a country that the Soviet Union could not conquer in ten years of trying, as well as support from unstable surrounding nations. Washington may be tempted to try to oust the Taliban regime, but doing so could rekindle Afghanistan's brutal civil war. The United States must proceed with caution -- or end up on the ash heap of Afghan history.
With U.S. troops on the ground in the Philippines and closer military ties developing to other countries in the region, Washington is taking the war on terror to Southeast Asia. But a military approach to the region's problems would be a deadly mistake: it could weaken local democracies and turn neutral forces into new enemies.
One of the tactics Israel has used in responding to terrorism has been to seek out and kill individual enemies. Now Washington has started doing the same. The United States and Israel face different circumstances, however, and so the Bush administration should think twice before proceeding.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.