Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945
Nobody is more qualified than Judt to combine serious descriptive history with incisive, original political analysis, to cover both western and eastern Europe, and to pass stinging yet informed judgments on the behavior and evasions, the deeds and the failings, of his subjects. He gives a very fine picture of the Stalinized half of the continent; a sympathetic account of the 1960s, which put an end to "a 180-year cycle of ideological politics in Europe"; and a virtuoso account of the policies of the European Community. He calls Gorbachev a victim of "the scale of the contradictions" his attempt at a "controlled revolution" aroused and describes movingly the longing for "returning to Europe" in the Eastern Europe of 1989. Nor does he believe that Washington "brought down" communism: it "imploded of its own accord." In describing a Europe no longer divided by the Iron Curtain, Judt notes the decline of the intellectuals and widespread nostalgia. And yet he sees the emergence of "Europe as a way of life," as a continent where the state remains central. He concludes with a moving piece on the Holocaust, an "essay on modern European memory." This monumental work is a tour de force -- and here "tour de force" must remain in French, despite Judt's remarks on the decline of the French language.
Related
The Polish elections may signal the dawning of a political force in Central and Eastern Europe-Christian democracy, with emphasis on both words.
The waning use of Russian in the old Soviet bloc is a gauge of the severity of the Soviet collapse. What is prized now is German and, above all, English.
Daniel Goldhagen's book on the Holocaust--condemning the German "eliminationist" mindset toward Jews--has become an international bestseller and a datum in German-American relations. Pity, because it is a simplistic, monocausal, and unhistorical explanation of one of the most complex horrors in history. For Goldhagen, as for the Nazis, Hitler is Germany.
