Americans should care deeply about the Doha Round, but many do not understand what it means for them and the rest of the world. With the talks barely moving, it is time for supporters of free trade to educate the American people in order to give Washington the backing it needs to break the deadlock.
CARLA A. HILLS, CEO of Hills & Company,
was U.S. Trade Representative during the administration of President George H. W.
Bush.
JUMP-STARTING A STALLED PROCESS
At the UN General Assembly last September, President Bush declared: "The United States is ready to eliminate all tariffs, subsidies and other barriers to the free flow of goods and services as other nations do the same." The Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiations aims to do just that. These negotiations hold the promise of raising standards of living worldwide, alleviating global poverty, removing inequities in the trade regime, and enhancing international stability. Yet there is a significant risk that they could collapse or achieve only a fraction of their potential.
Americans should care deeply about the Doha Round and what it means for them and the rest of the world. Yet the lack of concern about these negotiations among members of Congress and the media suggests Americans are unaware of what is at stake. For Americans, a successful conclusion of the trade negotiations would bring higher living standards. For the rest of the world, success would deliver not only higher economic growth but also greater political stability. With the talks barely moving forward, the world needs the United States to lead these negotiations as it has led past trade negotiations.
But anti-trade political pressures at home not only hinder the ability of the U.S. government to lead, they put at risk its ability to secure congressional approval of any agreement it brings home. Only by building a solid base of political support for new trade agreements can the United States capture the very substantial benefits that a Doha agreement could provide. Americans should be better informed about the gains possible from a broad Doha agreement, the status of the negotiations, and the political challenges involved.
WHY DOHA MATTERS
The U.S. experience since World War II proves that increased economic interdependence boosts economic growth and encourages political stability. For more than 50 years, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, the United States has led the world in opening markets. To that end, the United States worked to establish a series of international organizations, including the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 1947, only 23 nations participated in the first round of trade negotiations. Today, 148 nations are participating in the ninth round, the Doha Round.
Log in to continue reading
Access to this article is free for all registered users.
Log In
Related
The Doha Round could become the first major multilateral trade talks to fail since the 1930s. To prevent a collapse, policymakers in the G-8 and key developing countries must resolve global monetary and current account imbalances, counter the backlash against globalization, and find a way to jolt the talks back to life.
There have been eight rounds of multilateral trade negotiations prior to Doha. Although they all ended well, it is important to remember that few went smoothly. Negotiators in Hong Kong now face real obstacles, but there is reason for hope -- if, that is, they have the will and courage to do what is necessary to succeed.
Although few U.S. politicians will admit it, antidumping policy has strayed far from its original purpose of guarding against predatory foreign firms. It is now little more than an excuse for a few powerful industries to shield themselves from competition -- at great cost to both American consumers and American business.
