Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations
The European Union has come to rival -- indeed, to exceed -- the United States in the complexity (and lack of transparency) of its decision-making. This book explains how decision-making has evolved over time in the EU's principal area of competence, foreign trade negotiations, and how different institutional arrangements for EU decision-making have influenced the EU's bargaining with the United States. Four episodes are examined in detail: agricultural negotiations from 1964 to 1967 (the Kennedy Round), agricultural negotiations from 1986 to 1993 (the Uruguay Round), negotiations from 1990 to 1994 over introducing foreign competition into the granting of public contracts, and negotiations over civil aviation, especially the open-skies agreements, from 1992 to 2003. Meunier provides clear descriptions of the substantive issues involved, discusses how European political considerations were strongly influenced by decision-making arrangements, and assesses to what extent these institutional features influenced the outcome of the negotiations. The book focuses heavily on processes, demonstrating how important they can be; it does not attempt to assess the affect of the outcomes on the well-being of Europeans.
Related
A debate is unfolding over a new IMF proposal to avert future Argentina-style financial meltdowns: an international "Chapter 11" that would let a country declare bankruptcy, just like a troubled firm. Such a plan would represent an improvement over the current approach -- but it will not eliminate financial crises altogether.
Initially devised to maintain a system of fixed exchange rates, the IMF took on a new role during the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s-providing moderate amounts of credit, facilitating debt renegotiations, and recommending responsible macroeconomic policies. But the IMF is also applying the lessons of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, where a fundamental economic restructuring was necessary, to Asia. So in Korea, for example, the fund called for reform of inefficient conglomerates and inflexible labor laws. However beneficial in the long run, such changes are not needed to resolve the current crisis. By stepping in too far and too soon, the IMF discourages countries from seeking modest help. Even worse, it encourages bankers to undertake more risky loans, making another crisis more likely.
A new U.S. emphasis on African maritime development -- dedicated not only to rooting out piracy but also renovating ports and investing in job creation -- could improve African security and economic growth.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.