Pétain: How the Hero of France Became a Convicted Traitor and Changed the Course of History
A former banker and politician, Williams wrote an excellent biography of Charles de Gaulle, and he has now written one of de Gaulle's erstwhile superior and protector, Philippe Pétain. It is similarly a good read. During World War I, Pétain rose from the rank of colonel to that of marshal of France; he became known as "the savior of Verdun," admired for his concern for the lives of his soldiers and, as the real father of the Maginot Line, respected as "the most accomplished defensive tactician of any army." But Williams sees him as "forever the outsider -- a peasant in the company of swordsmen, a bachelor in the company of husbands, a lapsed believer in the company of devout Catholics." After World War I, his political career began. He was appointed deputy premier in May 1940, when defeat at the hands of Germany was imminent. When Prime Minister Paul Reynaud resigned the next month, Pétain, who had argued for an armistice, succeeded him, dispatched the Third Republic, and set up the Vichy regime. Williams' account of Pétain's gradual mental decline and of his many blunders as a political leader is impressive and fair, but this book is not, in fact, a revision of previous condemnations of Pétain's role in Vichy. Williams shows how flawed his trial in 1946 was, but all the evidence he produces confirms the judgment of most historians: that Pétain behaved as a misguided patriot who, in those awful years, did not have the strength of character that he needed. De Gaulle's quip -- that the marshal died in 1925 -- is cruel but justified.
Related
Tony Judt is right to have doubts about the future of European union, but his jeremiad lacks an eye for detail.
The history of the Atlantic Alliance is a history of crises. But we must distinguish between the routine difficulties engendered by Western Europe's dependence on the United States for its security, as well as by the economic interdependence of the allies, and major breakdowns or misunderstandings which reveal not simply an inevitable divergence of interests but dramatically different views of the world and priorities. At the present time, complaints from West European leaders about the effects of high American interest rates on their economies, or about President Reagan's skeptical approach to North-South economic issues, belong in the first category. The current controversy in Europe over nuclear weapons belongs in the second, and now confronts the Alliance with one of its most dangerous tests.
Not much attention was paid in March 1985, when the European Council, whose members include the chiefs of state and government of the 12 member states, decided that it should constitute a single market by 1992. After all, the European Community had been established in 1957 with the goal of a common market, and many people believed that the goal had been reached; tariffs within the Community had been abolished, a common external tariff put in place and a controversial common agricultural policy instituted.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.