Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990-1999
Many have studied the impact of politics on economic reform in the postsocialist countries, and many have studied the impact of economics on electoral outcomes in established democracies, particularly the United States. Far fewer have considered the effects of economic conditions on elections in postsocialist societies, and none so thoroughly or systematically as Tucker does in this book. In a very rigorous study of 20 presidential and parliamentary elections in five postsocialist countries, with results compared at a regional level, he finds that voters do not, as they do in the United States, favor incumbents when life is good and "throw the bums out" when life is bad, but rather that the "winners," those living in regions where economic conditions are better, vote for parties identified with political and economic transition, and the "losers," in regions where conditions are worse, vote for parties associated with the "old (socialist) regime." This, however, is a bare-bones synopsis of a hypothesis-rich study that not only adds much to our understanding of how economics affects voting behavior in the misty, shapeless political environment of would-be postsocialist democracies, but also suggests an imaginative alternative path of inquiry in regard to established multiparty democracies.
Related
With facts and a touch of fiction, Mikhail Gorbachev recounts the breakup of the Soviet Union and warns the West not to mangle the post-Cold War world.
Will Russia be run by democrats or oligarchs? The signs are worrying. The West would rather not dwell on the extent to which Russia's market is dominated by robber barons and permeated by crime and corruption. Russia's democracy is weak, with unfair election campaigns, a compromised media, and few checks on the presidency. The West cannot afford to let Russia descend into chaos, which might mean losing control of Russia's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, but its two-faced NATO expansion policy hurts the democrats' chances.
Russia's interests demand good relations with everyone, but older, darker forces tempt it to avenge its fall from superpowerdom. Westernizing democrats govern for now, but ex-communist elites and embittered generals scheme to re invigorate the military and reassert control over the borderlands. Their machinations are creating a fault line across the oil-rich Caucasus and Central Asia. For Russia to neglect its reconstruction to pursue the illusion of power would be a monumental mistake. While the expansion of NATO is misconceived, the West must not encourage Russian hard-liners with unmerited concessions.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.