Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France
Laurence, a young American political scientist, and Vaísse, a young French historian, have written a well-documented, nuanced, and ultimately optimistic study of French Muslims -- a convincing refutation of American clichés about the rise of Islamism in France, the effects of Muslims on French foreign policy, European anti-Semitism, and the incompatibility of Islam and the traditional French model of integration. The greatest obstacles to integration, they argue, are unemployment and the ghettoized big housing developments in suburban areas. For Muslim immigrants, French citizenship has not led to "the kind of social advancement and political integration that had been hoped for," although the troubles of November 2005 have jolted the government into introducing new programs. And yet, the great majority of the Muslims in France want to be integrated and demand not separateness (or multiculturalism) but to be treated as equals. "Banlieue anti-Semitism," Laurence and Vaísse argue, scapegoats Jews for the failures of Muslim integration. Their illuminating and impressive book concludes that "Islam in France is, above all, a question of internal French politics," and that domestic reforms are needed to "fine-tune the self-proclaimed universalism" of the French citizenship model.
Related
Two important new books explore just what it means to be English -- for an individual, for a nation, and for an erstwhile empire.
European elites lambaste the United States for bad behavior at home and hegemonic hubris abroad. These Europeans see an ominous transatlantic "values gap" emerging over the death penalty, guns, "Frankenfoods," and unchecked capitalism. And Washington's unilateralist obstinance on issues such as missile defense, land mines, and global warming only makes matters worse. But a closer look shows that Europe and the United States are in fact converging culturally, economically, and even strategically. This phony crisis in relations only makes it more difficult to tap the full potential of the transatlantic partnership.
Kosovo has reinforced the Balkans' image as a cauldron of ethnic hatred. Many commentators argue that the region has always been wracked by ancient hatreds, while others maintain that today's strains are artificially created by cynical postcommunist demagogues looking to legitimate their rule. Neither school has it right. Balkan ethnic strains are neither as ancient as time nor as recent as the rise to power of Slobodan Milosevic; rather, they are about as old as the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire. To a historian, today's Balkan crises are rooted in, above all, a crippling dependence on the ideology of expansionist nationalism.
