Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France
Laurence, a young American political scientist, and Vaísse, a young French historian, have written a well-documented, nuanced, and ultimately optimistic study of French Muslims -- a convincing refutation of American clichés about the rise of Islamism in France, the effects of Muslims on French foreign policy, European anti-Semitism, and the incompatibility of Islam and the traditional French model of integration. The greatest obstacles to integration, they argue, are unemployment and the ghettoized big housing developments in suburban areas. For Muslim immigrants, French citizenship has not led to "the kind of social advancement and political integration that had been hoped for," although the troubles of November 2005 have jolted the government into introducing new programs. And yet, the great majority of the Muslims in France want to be integrated and demand not separateness (or multiculturalism) but to be treated as equals. "Banlieue anti-Semitism," Laurence and Vaísse argue, scapegoats Jews for the failures of Muslim integration. Their illuminating and impressive book concludes that "Islam in France is, above all, a question of internal French politics," and that domestic reforms are needed to "fine-tune the self-proclaimed universalism" of the French citizenship model.
Related
Radical Islam is spreading across Europe among descendants of Muslim immigrants. Disenfranchised and disillusioned by the failure of integration, some European Muslims have taken up jihad against the West. They are dangerous and committed -- and can enter the United States without a visa.
An investigation into Polish atrocities against Jews during World War II has prompted a divisive, painful debate about antisemitism and what it means to be Polish. In rectifying one chapter of the historical record, the new research has magnified the heritage that still holds Poland back from becoming a truly pluralistic democracy.
In his article "Europe's Angry Muslims" (July/August 2005), Robert Leiken argues that European Muslims are "distinct, cohesive, and bitter." He later writes that Islamist terrorist groups should not be compared with marginal European terrorist groups because Islamist terrorists have a "social base" from which to operate. The implied claim that all European Muslims are or could be supporters of terrorists (if they are not terrorists themselves) needs to be answered.
