Race for the Exits: The Unraveling of Japan's System of Social Protection
For most of the post-World War II era, Japan's economy and welfare system were the envy of much of the world. But in the 1990s, things began to unravel: the economy stalled, and Japanese social-security programs suddenly appeared inadequate. Japan's unique system of "convoy capitalism" came to seem outdated, the promise of "life-time" employment was no longer a solid one, and the growing gap between rich and poor suggested that Japan was becoming a heartless society. A populace that had come to expect annual economic growth between six and nine percent was confronted with a one percent growth rate. Schoppa examines how Japanese companies and governments responded to the crisis by using Albert Hirschman's model of "exit, voice, and loyalty." He acknowledges that it is too early to say whether as a result of these negative developments Japan will experience fundamental reforms. In the meantime, however, what is striking is how unemotional the Japanese have been in accepting their national economic problems: "voice" has not taken the form of calls for revolutionary change, and a degree of "exit" from politics has not shaken the political system. Schoppa also deals in some detail with the decline in fertility rates, as Japanese women have started working more outside the home -- a break with tradition that may do more than anything else to bring real reform to Japan's economy and society.
Related
Are The Tiananmen Papers authentic? What do they tell us? The truth could overturn an official history that has stymied political reform in China for a decade.
Christopher Patten's new book goes beyond Hong Kong to offer a sensible middle ground in the debate over the link between culture and Asia's rise -- and fall.
For some months, 1966 promised to be a year of significant albeit gradual change in American policy toward Communist China. In a strange and paradoxical fashion, the emotional issues of the Viet Nam War opened the way for the most sober, responsible and even-handed public discussion of China since the Communists came to power. At Congressional hearings and in the mass media, scholars and leaders of opinion have dispassionately calculated the possibilities for change, and Administration leaders have in their customarily guarded language intimated that change was not impossible. Most significant of all, the American public demonstrated a gratifying degree of maturity by forgetting the old passions and asking for only facts and analyses about the new China. Our national mood was increasingly one of believing that with prudence and wisdom it would be possible to work toward gradually incorporating China into responsible world relationships.
