Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them
In this provocative book, the noted political scientist Mueller argues that reactions to terrorism are a greater threat than terrorism itself. The scope and destructiveness of international terrorism, he contends, are limited; it is the inflation of this threat and the policy overreactions to it that impose severe costs on society. Mueller is correct to note that very few people have died in terrorist attacks, especially compared with other causes of death, such as car accidents, but the real fear of terrorism is prospective: it is focused on the possibility that an extremist network will detonate a nuclear device in a major city. Mueller acknowledges such a possibility but, taking issue with Harvard's Graham Allison and other experts, finds the obstacles to such a terrorist act formidable. In surveying encounters with past foreign threats (Pearl Harbor, Soviet communism), he sees a pattern of exaggeration, posturing, and -- after 9/11 -- a "terrorism industry" that has a vested interest in alarmism. This book will provoke a lively debate -- and to the extent it encourages an honest discussion of risk, this is to be welcomed. Moreover, Mueller's recommendations are ultimately quite sensible: since overreacting to groups such as al Qaeda plays into their hands, a long-term response to terrorism should entail patient and methodical intelligence, law enforcement, and homeland security.
Related
The concepts emerging from the Bush administration's war on terrorism form a neoimperial vision in which the United States arrogates to itself the global role of setting standards, determining threats, and using force. These radical ideas could transform today's world order in a way that the end of the Cold War did not. The administration's approach is fraught with peril and likely to fail. If history is any guide, it will trigger resistance that will leave America in a more hostile and divided world.
The Age of Sacred Terror vividly recounts how al Qaeda emerged and how America responded. This sobering history reveals the true difficulty of the war on terror.
During the war on terrorism, George W. Bush has shown a split personality on the promotion of democracy abroad. Bush the realist seeks warm ties with dictators who may help in the fight against al Qaeda, while Bush the neo-Reaganite proclaims that democracy is the only true solution to terror. How the administration resolves this tension will define the future of U.S. foreign policy.
