A Corporate Solution to Global Poverty: How Multinationals Can Help the Poor and Invigorate Their Own Legitimacy
The late Milton Friedman once wrote that the corporation's sole responsibility is to maximize profits for its shareholders. The authors of this extended essay take sharp exception. On the contrary, they argue, firms that neglect public sentiment lose legitimacy and invite hostility and blame for all the alleged evils of globalization. Among a range of social objectives that firms should recognize, the authors focus on global poverty. Reducing poverty is an important international aim, but multinational corporations (MNCs), which in fact provide many new jobs in developing countries, typically do not include the reduction of poverty in their cost-benefit analyses for new overseas investments, nor does any international mechanism exist for evaluating and monitoring claims of poverty reduction or for giving credit where it is due. The authors make some dubious assertions in arguing that the social impact of MNCs is overwhelmingly positive, and they underestimate the practical difficulties of convincingly measuring the total social impact of any new activity. But they make a persuasive case that MNCs should broaden the range of issues they take into account in making decisions on their increasingly conspicuous activities, if for no other reason than to restore and maintain their legitimacy in the eyes of the public. The authors also advocate the formation of a new global institution, made up of governments, corporations, and nonprofit advocacy groups, to facilitate this broadening of objectives -- and to award kudos when it is merited.
Related
A new book by an eminent economist takes on globalization's critics, disarming them with logic and killing them with compassion.
The post-1945 free-trade regime is giving way to an emerging "market access" regime that is more flexible about border barriers, but more demanding about "fair competition" policies and about access for investment. In this new commercial environment, free trade and protectionism are proving to be a false dichotomy. As corporations globalize and create elaborate commercial partnerships, governments have to create a new global framework and tools for managing world commerce. In the market access regime, there will be roles for expanded industry codes, bilateral, minilateral and regional bargaining all coordinated by a reformed General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. The order of the day will be multilateralism from the bottom up.
Image and reputation have become essential parts of a state's strategic capital. Like branded products, branded states depend on trust and customer satisfaction. And they are the harbingers of a postmodern politics based on style as much as substance.

Sign-up for free weekly updates from ForeignAffairs.com.